Feature requests

I think if you guys could improve the algorithm to convert to more seamless polygonal topology, it would be far easier to create game/film assets. To me, this is a major thing. At the least, I have noticed sometimes the vertices are doubled or unconnected, able to be pulled apart (with very complex geometry), and it is difficult to remesh it perfectly. Even if the object is completely remeshed with millions of quads after import to Maya/Blender, it would be easier to deal with. Otherwise, INCREDIBLE program!

It will be a great feature for product design and CAD users to have the possibility of having measures written down including radial and angle dimensions.

Tags for object selection just like in photo management software. Example: select all 12 mm M5 bolts in the scene, that belong to part 1. There would be tags like : "screw", "M5", "12mm", "part1". This would allow for very effective management of large scenes.

When 2 points are very close together they can seem as one, I feel they should merge when close. Maybe it has a tolerance setting in the preferences?

you can see Inkscape Scroll Curve Tool what it is and how it works here: https://youtu.be/ZMzysbUAXw8?t=216

In 3ds max there has always been a feature that lets you weld vertices that were a distance apart. This is something I constantly need when modeling in Plasticity. The weld process in 3ds max automatically finds the 'midpoint of the two vertices, but it would be good if they could be selected and moved to a third point. A case in point where I've needed this feature is when modeling wings on aircraft, which often turns out to be a tricky exercise, particularly on something like an Airbus. Overall I find the snapping of vertices in Plasticity is not up to it when snapping vertices to lines, which is something that really needs to be addressed.

Currently, every action requires confirmation, which may not always be necessary. For instance, in Blender, accidental actions can be quickly undone or canceled with a right-click—making the workflow much faster. It would be more efficient if actions auto-confirmed when switching tools or selecting other objects, and if hotkeys could instantly execute commands like Move or Fillet without extra steps. This would streamline the workflow significantly There are more popular similar requests, so if you support this topic, please follow these links and vote. Hopefully this will help bring it to the attention of the dev team https://plasticity.canny.io/feature-requests/p/make-confirm-operation-optional https://plasticity.canny.io/feature-requests/p/eliminiting-time-wasting-procedures

I have a suggestion: to detect split edges, it would be helpful if the vertex points could be displayed. That way, you can see when an edge has been split unnecessarily.

Many user interaction requires additional approval by pressing Enter (RMB), while there is no need for that at all. There is the Undo function if something fails and it slows down everything when creating something without valid reason. Confirmation of a command is only required when running the command literally needs it. As an example when moving an object to 1 m to the right (X axis) looks like this in an efficient way with hotkeys: Select object, then: G /X /1 /Enter (Grab/ X axis/ 1m/ Confirm) This is in Plasticity: Select object, then: G /X /1/ Enter /Enter (The last Enter is totally not needed, wasting the time of the user) Also there is a lack of consistency, see the video when it comes to vertices. I could move control points freely without selecting move tool or pressing Enter, but if I want to move it freely with move tool, it requires Enter. it it true for almost everything I used in Plasticity; unnecessary approvals, not consistent approach on interactions (overall more interaction needed than it should need from UX designer perspective). It would be great to rethink the approach, Plasticity is a rare gem, it deserves the most efficient workflow.

Currently the only option for hotkey "B" fillet on a vertex is G1, it would improve the workflow and tool if they other fillet options where available too. Currently to make a G2 blend between 2 lines with equal offset you need to fillet it then trim the fillet away and use bridge curve. this could all be within the fillet tool itself. Akin to "super fillet"